Women are reading their way into herstory

The Autumn of the Patriarchs.  Women read, men ban books.  The end is nigh.

Read, baby, read—because this is how we write ourselves into the world. This is how we reclaim our story, our voice, our future.

Women’s rise is extraordinary precisely because it’s happening from behind. For centuries, we were locked out of education, barred from universities, shut out of public and intellectual life. What’s unfolding now isn’t the fruit of equal opportunity—it’s the result of relentless catching up. We’ve had to swim upstream, often against institutions designed to keep us small.

In 1900, less than 2% of women worldwide were literate. By 2020, that number had surged past 87%. Today, women read more, study more, graduate more—and yet we still earn less, lead less, and face relentless cultural backlash.

What gives?

This isn’t dominance. It’s the early tremor of long-delayed access. And already, some men are panicking.

The gender gap in reading isn’t just cultural—it’s prophetic. Women’s hunger for knowledge is quietly transforming the world. It’s altering relationships, shaking up marriage and fertility patterns, and redrawing the old maps of power. Intellectual capital is piling up like poker chips—and women increasingly hold the winning hand.

I. She who reads, rules¹

Women are accumulating intellectual capital at a rate which outpaces men.  The more women read, the more capable we become. Intellectual capital means having knowledge, discernment, and something to contribute. It’s the foundation for leadership, civic participation, and cultural influence. How society defines itself.  Women are increasingly stepping into those roles—not only as readers, but as writers, voters, professionals, and organizers.

Higher literacy is directly linked to political engagement. Women with stronger reading skills are more likely to vote, advocate, and take part in public life.⁶  Verbal fluency translates into visibility and influence. Reading strengthens our capacity to speak, and to be heard.⁶

bell hooks wrote that “true education is the practice of freedom.”⁷ For women, reading has always been one of the most reliable ways to challenge systems that exclude us.
Hélène Cixous argued that writing reclaims the female body. Reading is what prepares us to do that.⁷

The data is clear:

• Women read an average of 15 books per year, compared to 9 for men.⁴
• Male literary reading has declined by 20% since 1982, while women’s has remained steady or increased.⁵
• A 2021 Gallup poll found 64% of women identify as “avid readers,” compared to 45% of men.²⁹
• According to the NEA, women are 50% more likely than men to engage in literary reading of any kind.⁵

Reading sharpens the mind, and with that clarity comes your voice.  It is a tool which is meant to be used.  And with it comes confidence. Women have much to reclaim—starting with our bodies, our choices.  Didn’t your mother teach you to never feed wild tigers with your bare hands?

II. Literacy is Leverage²

Reading proficiency is the gateway to success in knowledge-driven economies. And women, by reading more—and reading better—are catching up. Our superior literacy skills are not just twee; they are the keys to the executive washroom.  Women are moving in and the men still have their pants down.

The World Bank calls literacy “a cornerstone of human capital.” Without it, access to economic life is sharply restricted.⁶. UNESCO puts it even more starkly: “Literacy is the bridge from misery to hope.” It opens doors to employment, mobility, and upward change.⁶
As bell hooks notes, literacy is essential to critical consciousness. Without it, people are easier to dominate.⁷

The numbers speak clearly:

• OECD PISA Scores (2022): Girls outperformed boys in reading literacy across every participating country. The global average gender gap in reading was 30–40 points—equivalent to a full year of formal education.¹
• In the U.S., women now earn 60% of bachelor’s degrees, 63% of master’s, and 54% of doctorates.²
• According to the World Economic Forum, the fastest-growing global sectors—education, health, business services—are all knowledge-intensive.³
• Women dominate those fields: 76% of U.S. public school teachers, 77% of healthcare practitioners, and 58% of social service workers are women.²
• Reading fluency correlates with higher lifetime earnings, greater job resilience, and adaptability—all critical in today’s economy.
• McKinsey (2023): By 2030, 105 million jobs will require advanced literacy and communication skills. Most are already being filled by women.³

Those who read well, earn more. They adapt faster. They’re better positioned to thrive in a world where thinking and communication are currency. Women’s reading habits aren’t just habits. They’re infrastructure. And they’re reshaping the economy—quietly, steadily, and with lasting effect.  So before sniffing at her ‘trashy’ novel, are you even reading?

III. Women’s Reading Groups are Subversive³

Women’s reading communities are more than social gatherings—they are informal networks of education, resistance, and mobilization. This is where women teach one another, build shared language, and cultivate critical consciousness outside the bounds of formal institutions.

Silvia Federici reminds us that patriarchies have always feared women’s knowledge—especially when it circulates beyond the state’s control.¹⁰
Audre Lorde warned that women’s insight cannot emerge from the master’s tools. Reading groups build our own.¹⁰
And bell hooks believed that feminist education doesn’t start in school—it begins in community. Reading together is a political act.⁷

The data backs this:

• In the UK, 89% of book club members are women.⁸
• In the US, 71% of adults in reading groups are women (National Arts Endowment, 2020).⁵
• Following the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson decision, feminist reading groups surged across platforms like Instagram and Discord, with crowdsourced reading lists and discussion threads multiplying.⁹
• Feminist and women-centered book clubs on Goodreads more than doubled in size between 2020 and 2023.
• Studies in the Journal of Literacy and Education show that women in reading groups report greater self-efficacy, stronger community ties, and increased political awareness.

Literacy becomes culture when it’s shared. In reading circles, women don’t just share stories—we shape truth.  The building of community is the weaving of the fabric of society.  And with every passing day, this process is done with the voices of women.

We know now what it feels like to have a voice.  We won’t give it up.

IV. The crisis of the illiterate man⁴

As women rise—through reading, education, and professional achievement—some men fall behind. Not because they are asked to, but because they wimp out.  The backlash which follows is the cry of the entitled wimp.

The erosion of traditional male dominance in education and the workforce has helped fuel the rise of reactionary politics. When women gain ground, some men, the weak ones, respond with violence, legislative regression, and attempts to reassert control over women’s bodies. This isn’t incidental. It’s a co-ordinated backlash.

bell hooks warned that patriarchy wounds boys early—by denying them emotional literacy and encouraging them to see vulnerability as weakness.⁷
When boys are taught that empathy is feminine and reading is soft, they grow into men without the very tools that might save them.⁷

As Richard Reeves writes: “A large share of American men are stuck—struggling in the classroom, the workplace, and in the family.”¹¹ His solution is clear: invest in boys’ education. His implication is clearer: women are not the problem—male neglect is.  I like the theory.  Sort of.  But I also can’t help but think it is still about men.  Isn’t it tiring.  Why can’t men just man up?  

Why does anyone think that men aren’t men anymore?  Strip away the unlevel playing field, and you realise most men don’t even belong on the pitch.  And instead of equipping themselves with the tools they need to compete in the modern world, they choose to howl in bitterness and self-pity from the sidelines.  Talk about toxic masculinity…that’s the breeding ground for it right there.

Why do so many men react this way? Why are incels even a thing?  Why drop out of school, withdraw from work, and lash out at women who succeed? What are they so afraid of?  A quiet admission: “I can’t compete unless women are forced to compete with their hands tied behind their backs.”  For shame.

The cowards hymn book is filled with songs of grievance and none about personal responsibility.

If you listen to the lament of the cowards hymn book, it is just a tantrum of those who once held a usurped power they never earned, and are now unprepared to meet women on equal terms.

The data tells the story:

• Educational Disparities: Men are now 10% less likely than women to complete college, with male dropout rates still rising.¹¹
• In 1970, 58% of college students were men; by 2020, only 41% were.²
• Among Black students, the gap is even wider: Black women earned two-thirds of all degrees awarded to Black students in 2021.²
• Online Radicalization: Incel-related activity increased 400% between 2016 and 2020.¹² The SPLC now classifies some male supremacist groups as hate organizations.
• Political Extremism: Pew (2022) reports that over 80% of those who express sympathy for authoritarian leaders are men.
• Legislative Backlash: In 2023, more than 300 anti-LGBTQ+ bills were introduced in U.S. state legislatures—most sponsored by male lawmakers.¹³

Misogyny isn’t a strategy. It’s fear.
And the refusal to read, grow, or adapt isn’t resistance, it’s surrender, dressed up as rage.

V. Why the Ring isn’t the only thing going back in the box⁵

As women gain education, income, and autonomy, traditional marriage rates are in freefall. And it’s not just because men are “less marriageable”, it’s because women are less willing to settle. And why would you when you have choice?  When women read, earn, and lead, we begin to ask sharper questions about what marriage offers—and what it demands.

Marriage—once a contract of survival—is being re-evaluated as a contract of constraint. A growing number of women are unwilling to exchange autonomy for security, especially when they’ve built the security themselves.

Simone de Beauvoir called marriage “an institution that reduces women to dependent creatures.”¹⁷
bell hooks was even blunter: the traditional wife role, she said, was cultural servitude. Feminism begins by refusing to be owned.¹⁷

Today’s educated woman reads, earns, and chooses. And she knows exactly what she’s giving up when she chooses not to marry.

The numbers show the shift:

• Marriage Trends: The marriage rate for college-educated women in the U.S. has dropped by 20% over the past two decades.¹⁴
• Fertility Rates: In countries where women have equal or greater income than men, marriage and fertility rates decline significantly.¹⁵
• Attitudes Toward Partnership: A 2022 Pew survey found that 56% of single women prefer being alone to being with a partner who holds them back.¹⁶
• Delayed Marriage: According to 2023 Eurostat data, in Sweden, Germany, and France, university-educated women are twice as likely to delay marriage until after age 35.
• Japan: In a society with rigid gender expectations around marriage, 60% of women aged 18–34 now say they are uninterested in ever marrying.
• Feminist Analysis: Scholars have long critiqued marriage as an institution that reinforces women’s economic and social subordination.¹⁷

This isn’t a crisis of romance. It’s a redefinition of value. For many women, the rewards of marriage no longer outweigh the cost to freedom, career, or self-determination.

The real shift? It’s not that women are giving up on marriage. It’s that we’ve stopped treating it as the default. And that’s what makes it powerful.

VI. Smart money bets on women⁶

Female education and literacy are among the strongest predictors of a nation’s overall health, democratic resilience, and economic performance—often surpassing traditional metrics like GDP in predictive power.

Over the past century, global female workforce participation has more than doubled, rising from under 20% in the early 1900s to over 50% today.⁶² In the last three decades alone, women’s rising participation in the labor force has accounted for 30–40% of total global GDP growth.⁶³,⁶⁴ And yet, women still make up the majority of the world’s untapped labor force—with over 90% of that potential concentrated among educated women in low- and middle-income countries.⁶⁵,⁶⁶

You want growth? Prosperity? Educate girls. Remove the barriers. Let women in.

It makes everyone richer.
Even the incels.
Who can then upgrade from toilet paper to silk hankies for drying their tears when they realize we really did slam the door on the way out.

Amartya Sen called educating women the single most powerful tool for improving public health and economic growth.¹⁸
UNESCO and UNDP agree: where women are literate, societies flourish.²⁰
bell hooks taught that education is not only a right—it is a method of liberation.⁷

Where women read, children survive. Where women are educated, democracies hold. Where women lead, justice is measurable.

The numbers are clear:

• The World Bank notes that female literacy reduces infant mortality by 30–50% over time.¹⁸
• According to UNESCO, nations with the highest rates of female literacy also rank highest on the Human Development Index.¹⁹
• In Rwanda, targeted educational programs for women after the genocide led to a 45% increase in female parliamentary representation.
• In India, states like Kerala—with high female literacy—consistently outperform others in public health, infant survival, and female workforce participation.
• The global literacy gap between men and women has narrowed from 22% in 1970 to under 6% today.²⁰
• In countries where female literacy exceeds 90%, trust in public institutions rises, and gender-based violence declines measurably.
• Each additional year of female education correlates with a 10% decrease in fertility rates.¹⁸

This isn’t coincidence. It’s cause and effect.
Educated women don’t just lift households. They stabilize democracies. They drive public health. They reshape nations.

But smart women also don’t have babies when the game is rigged against them. Hence the blunt tool of rolling back reproductive rights.

Don’t worry, boys. We see you. We know your game.
You will not win—because only women give life.

If you’re investing in the future, there’s only one smart bet: bet on women.

It’s Too Late to Go Back, Boys. If You’re Smart, You’ll Just Get Behind and Push

Female literacy is not a soft metric—it’s a civilizational turning point. Across country after country, it predicts lower child mortality, higher economic output, and more resilient democratic institutions. According to OECD well-being reports, nations that rank highest in quality of life—Norway, Finland, Sweden, New Zealand—all share one thing in common: high levels of female education, workforce participation, and political representation.⁶⁷

And the benefits go beyond public health and governance. Pew and Gallup data show that single women are not only more independent—they’re happier.⁶⁸ In the U.S., single women report higher life satisfaction than married women by 8 to 12 points, especially where marriage is linked to unequal caregiving, financial strain, or lost freedom.⁶⁹

So what becomes of men, if women no longer need them?
What happens when women do not want marriage—and men, as currently constituted, are offering little else?

The answer cannot be repression.
It cannot be regression.
It cannot be rage.

If men want to remain relevant, they must evolve.
Literacy is not just a skill—it is a signal.
Read, or be left behind.

Let women not forget: every right we now hold—the right to vote, to work, to keep our name, to control our bodies, to wear trousers, to cut our hair, to say no—was fought for. And every single one of those rights can be lost.

And they are coming for us.
Trans women are simply the opening salvo.

In 2020, nearly half of white American women voted for a man credibly accused of sexual assault—a man who bragged about grabbing women “by the pussy,” and who appointed the very justices who overturned Roe v. Wade.⁷⁰

What story must a woman believe to vote for her own subjugation?

This is why we must read.
Because propaganda will always tell us who to be.
But books—books help us think for ourselves.

We know better.

Men are the modern-day sirens—Scylla and Charybdis—singing songs of sweet patriarchy to lure us back to shore. But the rocks on which their world founders are now visible: the unspoken truth that the game has always been rigged against women.

We would be mad to go back.

It is a sad man who demands the submission of women. And it is a blameless woman who gives in—because maybe she’s just tired.
But the more we read, the more we know, the more we realize: a different world is worth the fight.

Today’s backlash is deliberate. The overturning of Roe v. Wade is not merely legal—it’s ideological. It is a renewed attempt to control reproduction and strip bodily autonomy from women. The fight against trans rights is no different: a campaign to reassert male authority over the meaning of womanhood, femininity, and the body itself.

These aren’t isolated regressions. They are part of a strategy to reclaim power women have worked centuries to build.

That’s why they ban books.
That’s why they gut school curricula.
That’s why they erase queer and feminist authors from public access.

These are not incidental acts. They are efforts to silence.

But we know better.
Like the marginalized before us, we escape the virtual ghetto the same way they escaped the real one: through education, through organization, through refusing to accept the stories others write about us.

And we are doing it now.

• African American high school completion rose from 68% in 1992 to 91% in 2021.⁷¹
• Hispanic college attainment among 25–29-year-olds rose from 20% in 2010 to 34% in 2022.⁷²
• Asian Americans have the highest college graduation rates in the U.S.—54% hold a bachelor’s degree or higher.⁷³
• Nigerian immigrants outperform every group: 61% hold at least a bachelor’s degree.⁷⁴

This is what change looks like.

We’re not waiting for permission.
We’re already building the future—with books in our hands and each other by our sides.

And if you’re looking for me?

You’ll find me in my reading groups.
Starting revolutions.

References:

1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. PISA 2022 Results: Volume I – The State of Learning Outcomes Worldwide. OECD Publishing, 2022.
2. National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics, 2023. U.S. Department of Education, 2023.
3. McKinsey Global Institute. The Future of Work After COVID-19. McKinsey & Company, 2023.
4. Pew Research Center. “Who Doesn’t Read Books in America?” September 1, 2016. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/09/01/who-doesnt-read-books-in-america/.
5. National Endowment for the Arts. Reading at Risk: A Survey of Literary Reading in America. NEA, 2020.
6. Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harvard University Press, 1995.
7. hooks, bell. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge, 1994; Cixous, Hélène. “The Laugh of the Medusa.” Signs 1, no. 4 (1976): 875–893.
8. The Reading Agency. “Book Clubs and Social Engagement.” 2021.
9. Bitch Media. “The Feminist Book Club Boom.” 2019.
10. Federici, Silvia. Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation. Brooklyn: Autonomedia, 2004.
11. Reeves, Richard V. Of Boys and Men: Why the Modern Male Is Struggling, Why It Matters, and What to Do About It. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2022.
12. Institute for Strategic Dialogue. “The Incel Ideology: Masculinity, Vulnerability and Power.” 2020.
13. Human Rights Campaign. “2023 State Legislative Attacks on LGBTQ+ People.” 2023.
14. U.S. Census Bureau. Marriage and Divorce Rates by Educational Attainment: 2000–2020. 2020.
15. United Nations Population Division. World Fertility Report 2024. New York: United Nations, 2024.
16. Pew Research Center. “The State of Dating and Relationships.” 2022.
17. de Beauvoir, Simone. The Second Sex. New York: Vintage Books, 2011; hooks, bell. Feminism Is for Everybody: Passionate Politics. Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 2000.
18. World Bank. “Education and Fertility Decline.” 2023.
19. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. “Literacy and Development Indicators.” 2022.
20. United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 2022. New York: UNDP, 2022.
21. OECD. How’s Life? Measuring Well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020.
22. Pew Research Center. “The Ties That Bind: Is Marriage Losing Its Grip?” 2022.
23. New York Times. “2020 Presidential Election Exit Polls.” Accessed 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/03/us/elections/exit-polls-president.html.
24. U.S. Department of the Treasury. “Racial Differences in Educational Experiences and Attainment.” August 2022. https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/post-5-racial-differences-in-educational-experiences-and-attainment.
25. U.S. Census Bureau. “Educational Attainment in the United States: 2021.” March 2022. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022/educational-attainment.html.
26. National Center for Education Statistics. “Young Adult Educational Attainment.” 2022. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/caa.
27. Pew Research Center. “Facts on U.S. Latinos, 2022.” https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/09/29/facts-on-u-s-latinos/.
28. Migration Policy Institute. “Nigerian Immigrants in the United States.” 2020. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/nigerian-immigrants-united-states-2020.

29. Gallup. “Americans Reading Fewer Books Than in Past.” Southwest Ledger, January 2022. https://www.southwestledger.news/news/americans-are-reading-fewer-books-past.
30. Curtis, Sabrina. “Black Girl Politics: Curricular Interventions for Nurturing Black Girls’ Political Consciousness.” Journal of African American Women and Girls in Education 4, no. 1 (2024): 7–30. https://jaawge-ojs-tamu.tdl.org/jaawge/article/view/155.
31. Pew Research Center. “Who Likes Authoritarianism, and How Do They Want to Change Their Government?” February 28, 2024. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/02/28/who-likes-authoritarianism-and-how-do-they-want-to-change-their-government/.
32. Pew Research Center. “The Ties That Bind: Is Marriage Losing Its Grip?” 2022.
33. Gallup. “Record-High 56% of U.S. Women Prefer Working to Homemaking.” August 2019. https://news.gallup.com/poll/267737/record-high-women-prefer-working-homemaking.aspx.
34. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. PISA 2022 Results: Volume I – The State of Learning Outcomes Worldwide. OECD Publishing, 2022.
35. National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics, 2023. U.S. Department of Education, 2023.
36. McKinsey Global Institute. The Future of Work After COVID-19. McKinsey & Company, 2023.
37. Pew Research Center. “Who Doesn’t Read Books in America?” September 1, 2016. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/09/01/who-doesnt-read-books-in-america/.
38. National Endowment for the Arts. Reading at Risk: A Survey of Literary Reading in America. NEA, 2020.
39. Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harvard University Press, 1995.
40. hooks, bell. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge, 1994; Cixous, Hélène. “The Laugh of the Medusa.” Signs 1, no. 4 (1976): 875–893.
41. The Reading Agency. “Book Clubs and Social Engagement.” 2021.
42. Bitch Media. “The Feminist Book Club Boom.” 2019.
43. Federici, Silvia. Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation. Brooklyn: Autonomedia, 2004.
44. Reeves, Richard V. Of Boys and Men: Why the Modern Male Is Struggling, Why It Matters, and What to Do About It. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2022.
45. Institute for Strategic Dialogue. “The Incel Ideology: Masculinity, Vulnerability and Power.” 2020.
46. Human Rights Campaign. “2023 State Legislative Attacks on LGBTQ+ People.” 2023.
47. U.S. Census Bureau. Marriage and Divorce Rates by Educational Attainment: 2000–2020. 2020.
48. United Nations Population Division. World Fertility Report 2024. New York: United Nations, 2024.
49. Pew Research Center. “The State of Dating and Relationships.” 2022.
50. de Beauvoir, Simone. The Second Sex. New York: Vintage Books, 2011; hooks, bell. Feminism Is for Everybody: Passionate Politics. Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 2000.
51. World Bank. “Education and Fertility Decline.” 2023.
52. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. “Literacy and Development Indicators.” 2022.
53. United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 2022. New York: UNDP, 2022.
54. OECD. How’s Life? Measuring Well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020.
55. Pew Research Center. “The Ties That Bind: Is Marriage Losing Its Grip?” 2022.
56. New York Times. “2020 Presidential Election Exit Polls.” Accessed 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/03/us/elections/exit-polls-president.html.
57. U.S. Department of the Treasury. “Racial Differences in Educational Experiences and Attainment.” August 2022. https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/post-5-racial-differences-in-educational-experiences-and-attainment.
58. U.S. Census Bureau. “Educational Attainment in the United States: 2021.” March 2022. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022/educational-attainment.html.
59. National Center for Education Statistics. “Young Adult Educational Attainment.” 2022. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/caa.
60. Pew Research Center. “Facts on U.S. Latinos, 2022.” https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/09/29/facts-on-u-s-latinos/.
61. Migration Policy Institute. “Nigerian Immigrants in the United States.” 2020. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/nigerian-immigrants-united-states-2020.
62. International Labour Organization, Women in Business and Management: Gaining Momentum (Geneva: ILO, 2015), https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/WCMS_316450/lang–en/index.htm.
63. Kathy Matsui et al., Womenomics 4.0: Time to Walk the Talk (Goldman Sachs, 2018), https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/pages/gs-research/womenomics-4.0-report.pdf.
64. McKinsey Global Institute, The Power of Parity: How Advancing Women’s Equality Can Add $12 Trillion to Global Growth (McKinsey & Company, 2015), https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/how-advancing-womens-equality-can-add-12-trillion-to-global-growth.
65. World Bank Group, Women, Business and the Law 2023 (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2023), https://wbl.worldbank.org/en/reports.
66. OECD, Gender Data Portal: Education and Employment, 2022, https://www.oecd.org/gender/data/
67. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), How’s Life? 2020: Measuring Well-being (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020), https://www.oecd.org/statistics/how-s-life-23089679.htm.
68. Pew Research Center, Single Americans and Their Dating Habits, February 2020, https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/02/06/single-americans-and-their-dating-habits/.
69. Gallup, Well-Being Survey: Life Satisfaction by Marital Status and Gender, 2022, https://news.gallup.com/poll/352427/life-satisfaction-varies-marital-status.aspx.
70. Jessica Bennett, “Why Do Women Still Vote for Trump?” The New York Times, October 28, 2020, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/28/us/women-voters-trump.html.
71. U.S. Department of Education, Digest of Education Statistics, 2022, https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d22/.
72. U.S. Census Bureau, Educational Attainment in the United States: 2022, https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2022/demo/education-attainment/cps-detailed-tables.html.
73. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), The Condition of Education 2023, https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/caa.
74. Migration Policy Institute, “Nigerian Immigrants in the United States,” 2022, https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/nigerian-immigrants-united-states.