Rituals of Amnesia

American Exceptionalism: the blood-stained Theocracy of White Supremacy

Disclaimer:  I use the term “America” here to refer to the United States of America.  Not to the United States of Mexico, or to Canada—the North American triumvirate, or to all of the countries which make up Central and South America, who also have a rightful claim to “America”.  I have used it as the United States, for better or worse, has usurped the name, and carries it without much regard to others, and in a way, the term has now been contaminated, despite its mythic quality.

I used to love the American holiday of Thanksgiving.  As an American transplant living abroad, my truth since childhood, grabbing on to little vestiges of my sense of place, identity, was always a selective process.  And conscious.

I didn’t grow up in Suburban America, which seems to be the nation’s true essence.  What one writer described in an aptly named book, The Air-Conditioned Nightmare.  No.  I was latching on to the things I felt were positive.

As an expat we have the benefit of distance.  A bit like hindsight, distance offers the present sight equivalent of greater clarity.  It was impossible growing up to not meet people who had not swallowed the American narrative wholesale.  In Latin America there are the vestiges of literal Imperialism, regime change, interference in domestic policy, and this overwhelming presence that Big Brother is a bully.

Or worse, that Capitalism itself is evil.  That Capitalism be tied to “America” as an ideal is not even a little bit strange. There is no nation which stands most side-by-side at least in the popular imagination, even if this is not matched by regulatory reality.  And in a sense, the general tide of favour/disfavour towards Captialism as an organising seems to ebb and flow with the vagaries of how America is perceived.

I’d say my most profound awakening began whilst living in Italy during my undergrad years and sharing a flat with a wealthy South American leftist.  He challenged my assumptions.  As a friend.  A very good friend.  And I admired the gentle way in which he unpicked the narrative and got me to self-examine these stories for the first time.

The seductive narrative of socialism is a powerful one.  Yet, it has been vanquished on the field, beaten by the worst of humanity—our collective inability towards charity, relentless tribalism and the “othering” which comes with it, the merciless have and have-not worldview which sees kicking down and kicking while they’re down not just condoned but expected.

It has also been vanquished as the megaphone belongs to the bully.  Might makes right.  To the victor the spoils.  The last one standing gets to tell the story.  To be rich is admirable, to be stinking rich is to be beyond question.  

These are the conditions by which American Thanksgiving has been able to take on a patina of respectability.  We leave out the rape of the land, the native blood spilled, the turning course of history.  Oh, but Thanksgiving was born from the comity between peoples which happened that first winter when the settlers were starving, people who had fled religious persecution, and the natives brought them food, taught them how to survive, showed them where and how to fish, to cure, and helped.  

That is what we tell ourselves.  What we leave out is that this was a bunch of hardened bounders, religious zealouts whose reductive view of God’s word led to the Salem Witch trials and the importation of toxic male fear of the female which underpinned it.  And on a personal note, led to the killing of innocent people, including my 12th great grandmother, the last woman to be executed for witchcraft in the future USA.

What we have left out is that the real motivating force behind the Colonies lay in its charter, which was a “God-sanctioned” contract with a group of mercurial investors, who were gambling on this group of self-righteous thugs to rape the land with such vigour that they would provide a handsome return on capital.

  • Virginia Company Charter (1606)
  • Massachusetts Bay Charter (1629)

Early relations with the natives were governed by this.  What ensued, not just in what became the United States, but throughout the Americas, was a rape and genocide, a wiping out of the most extensive and richest culture known to earth of a people who had managed to live sustainably and largely in harmony with the rhythms and conditions of our planet.  Genocide.  That is what Thanksgiving stands for.

  • King Philip’s War (1675–1678)
  • The Pequot Massacre (1637)
  • Indian Removal Act (1830)

These are not justifiable incidents, they were a reflection of bully-boy ethics mixed with greed and a sense of manifest destiny—God “gives” to those who take.  It was codified in law and enforced by the state, the “Indian” Removal Act resulted in the Trail of Tears, in short, ethnic cleansing.  And the refusal to name Thanksgiving for what it is, perpetuates the sin.

And when I think about the current tenor of the United States, the arc is unbroken.  The rise of MAGA is just another ugly face of Manifest Destiny, a Klanish cult of the great white man, gussied up on a national scale: the sanctioning of might means right and the enshrining of structural hate.  This is America.  It is in plain sight and no longer afraid of its shadow. Perfectly in keeping with the origin story.  It is simply the next chapter, but the narrative is continuous.

The silver lining is that we can see it now, can no longer deny it.

And so, as we flow from Thanksgiving into Christmas and a general spirit of bonhomie and love thy fellow “man”, let us not lose sight of the true narrative, or pretend it is anything but ugly.  And as we slip past the holidays, and to New Years, where we celebrate what has passed before leaping into the future, hearts and loins steeled for challenge and resolutions, let us make these ones.

We are all guilty

We must atone

Silence is complicity

Live the narrative that you want to be part of

Don’t just agree, do

And for those of you out there who think there is something wrong with being “woke”; who might not like the idea of calling Thanksgiving a holiday which celebrates theft, rape and genocide; and who thinks using pronouns or letting trans people pee in public conveniences which match their gender identity, shame on you.  I will see you in Hell.  I’ll be the one at the door, punching your tickets for admission to eternal damnation.  You. have the tools to look in the mirror.  You just have to open your eyes.

About the Author

I am a direct lineal descendant of American royalty, the three true founding fathers: Miles Standish, William Bradford, and William Brewster.  Together these three men represented the essence of the colonialisation project.  Military: might makes right;  Governance: the normalisation and systemisation of extractive capitalism; and Spirituality: that it is our God-given right to do this—we are the chosen ones.  

I am a Daughter and a Son of the American Revolution.  I am white.  I am a child of extreme privilege.  I went to one of most prestigious prep schools in the country, an exponent of muscular Christianity, and attended an Ivy League university whose endowment was built on the backs of slaves.  Thankfully, there was a rupture in all this perfection, the kind that let me see behind the curtain, just as Dorothy did.  Thank you for reading.

Happy holidays.

Author

  • Femina Viva

    Beyond the gender binary is my story of life and how I manage to navigate a patriarchal world unable to accept my body, my place in the world, and the patriarchy, while finding a way to having a healthy, wholesome, and progressive professional and personal life. Compromise is survival. I survive to make the world better for having been here. Leave a legacy.

    View all posts

Discover more from Beyond Non-Binary

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 thoughts

  1. FWIW
    Thanksgiving was a generally New England alternative to Christmas, and not associated with the first Pilgrims. It wasn’t nationally customary until after the Civil War, and not legislated by Congress until FDR. I associate it with “socialism,” if I were to assign it a political or economic origin.

    1. Thanks for engaging — I think we’re talking past one another slightly. You’re right that Thanksgiving was not a continuously legislated national holiday from the 17th century, and that its federal codification came much later. But legal recognition and cultural meaning aren’t the same thing. Governments tend to formalise traditions that already carry social weight; they don’t invent them wholesale.
      The critique in my essay isn’t about when Congress fixed a day off work — it’s about the origin story America tells itself about gratitude, settlement, and innocence, which explicitly ties Thanksgiving to the Pilgrims and early colonial mythology. That narrative is still taught, repeated, and ritually reinforced regardless of when the holiday became statutory.
      I’m also not aware of any serious historical case for Thanksgiving functioning as an “alternative to Christmas,” nor for it having a coherent socialist origin — harvest feasts and communal meals long predate modern political categories.
      In short: my argument is about myth, memory, and continuity — not the mechanics of federal calendars.

      1. I won’t argue it’s not advertised as an “American” holiday; it is. What I’m trying to explain is that the “traditional” holiday for most Americans was, until historically recent years, Christmas, not Thanksgiving. The origin story is retconned for political expedience, and the general target of criticism becomes exactly the same Americans whose own family history provides ample anecdotes that the origin story is false. Which, I suppose, is another way of saying we disagree regarding “formalize traditions that already carry social weight.” My understanding is that nobody really celebrated Thanksgiving as we now understand it before 1900. We take the holiday for granted, but it’s like MLK Day, a new invention serving a political purpose whatever you may think of MLK or Pilgrims.

      2. I think we’re actually much closer than this exchange suggests. I agree with you that Thanksgiving, as a nationally standardised, family-centred holiday, is a relatively modern invention, and that it was consolidated for political purposes in the 19th and early 20th centuries. That’s not in dispute — and it’s precisely why I’m interested in it.

        Where I think we differ is that you’re treating this as a reason to downgrade its significance, whereas I’m treating it as the point. Invented traditions are not trivial; they are among the most powerful tools states and cultures use to shape memory, identity, and moral narrative. The fact that Thanksgiving was retrofitted, mythologised, and nationalised is exactly what makes it such a revealing object of critique.

        Whether most Americans in 1750 or 1850 centred Christmas more than Thanksgiving doesn’t really touch the argument. The question isn’t “what did people used to celebrate?” but “what story does the modern ritual tell now, and why this one?” In that sense, Thanksgiving functions less like Christmas and more like any civic myth — a story about origins, innocence, and belonging that smooths over violence in the past to stabilise the present.

        So yes — it is an invention serving a political purpose. That’s not a rebuttal of my essay; it’s a restatement of its thesis.

  2. We are definitely arguing about nitpicking details. So, yes, I agree, but (and I may offend)…
    I think “Americans” put emphasis on Thanksgiving to shift the conversation from Americans who emphasize Christmas… and the emphasis on Thanksgiving targets Americans who emphasize Christmas. I think this was always the intent because the goal was a reordering of society similar to the Puritan shift away from Christmas (for different reasons). The new narrative, I think you agree, was a saccharine story free of the blood and gore in the founding. There’s also the trouble inherent to the Christmas message which sets the Christ child at its center.
    Ultimately, like so much online to which I respond, this isn’t some theoretical thing for me, but personal. Whether or not you mean me, personally, or my comments refer to you, personally, it hits each of us a little like a gut punch when something is associated with us, and we catch blame for it, but that thing isn’t ours.
    That’s not to say you’re not over the target. MAGA is very, very, angry, and that anger is directed often at people like yourself, sometimes with much forethought, and often thoughtlessly. [I’m guilty of both.] And most of MAGA isn’t so sophisticated that Thanksgiving isn’t some holy holiday akin to Super Bowl Sunday. But most of MAGA et al (or at least the part that I think troubles you most) isn’t really a Thanksgiving crowd, per se.
    Anyway… keep writing. I enjoy your thoughts even though we’re very far apart on many topics. And Happy New Year!

Leave a Reply